Consequently, when Kelly entered her teenage years, she became convinced that her mother was terrible and adamantly refused to see her. During the challenging times, the woman sought solace in her best friend, Tina. She regarded Tina as her confidant and rock, expressing that she might not have endured without her friend’s support.
As the years unfolded, the woman persistently reached out to her daughter. The woman directed her efforts toward reconstructing her life, delving into the field of accountancy, and securing a well-paying job. Conversely, her ex-husband faced a string of misfortunes.
Alongside losing his job, he found himself embroiled in a lawsuit filed by one of his employees. Despite facing financial difficulties, he persisted in maintaining his extravagant lifestyle and depleted all his funds, including the money intended for Kelly’s college tuition. At that point, Kelly, 21, wanted to reconnect with her mother.
“I won’t lie and say that I wasn’t hurt at the idea of her only wanting contact was for my money…” she said. Although the woman consented to support her daughter’s graduate school tuition financially, Kelly had to sign a contract relinquishing her status as her mother’s heir, as specified in the woman’s will. The woman expressed a desire for the majority of her estate and assets to be allocated to Tina’s daughter, Laura, who had become akin to a daughter over the preceding years.
Laura, 18, was also her goddaughter. The woman, still maintaining positive connections with a handful of relatives, believed that following their advice would harm any prospect of repairing a relationship with Kelly. They suggested splitting everything equally.
Nevertheless, she was hesitant to foster a relationship with Kelly that felt transactional or required financial compensation. What do you think about this story?
